The harrowing reality of UK poverty: ‘I, Daniel Blake’ [Review]

i-daniel-blake-3In 1967, Ken Loach’s film Cathy Come Home was a seminal moment in the national consciousness about homelessness. The film led directly to the formation of the national housing charity Shelter.

I, Daniel Blake is a Cathy Come Home for our times.  Loach has once again shone an unflinching spotlight on poverty in the UK today.  Its a film for the zero hours contract, austerity, food bank, benefit-sanction era we are currently living in.

Gritty reality

Daniel Blake has the jagged edges of all Ken Loach films, with abrupt fade-outs between scenes and and extras who act like they have been plucked raw from the community. Thus gritty reality is embedded in the very texture of the film.

Many films rely on the extraordinary. Poverty and hardship is often just a backdrop, a context from which incredible individuals escape, move on and find their dreams. These Hollywood narratives can be inspiring and powerful. But they rarely reflect reality.

In contrast Daniel Blake is a deeply ordinary story. It lays bare the monotony, anger and frustration created by poverty and dealing with welfare bureaucracy.  And from my experience of the council estates I have lived in, and the homeless hostels and community centres I have worked at, the characters are convincing and their situations ring true. Daniel is a middle-aged carpenter who has lost his wife to illness and has had a recent heart attack which has meant he has had to stop working. At the Job Centre Plus, he bumps into Katie, a single mum who has just moved into the area.


I lived in a block of flats in Kings Cross very similar to where Daniel Blake lives. My neighbours were people quite similar to the characters depicted – by and large decent people struggling in different ways to bring up their kids right, make ends meet and to look out for each other.

The situations conveyed in the film also resonate with conversations I have with homeless people coming into the West London Mission.  Michael, the rough sleeper staying at our winter shelter that I wrote about earlier this week, told me about how his computer-phobia and mental health problems caused him to walk out of a government course that he had been told to complete. This in turn led to his housing benefit being cut, being evicted from his flat and becoming homeless on the street.

Ken Loach is not making this stuff up. I, Daniel Blake may be a fictional story but its one that reflects reality.

3 Faces of PovertyFaces of poverty

The film reinforced my view that deprivation in the UK is complex fusion of different forms of poverty.

Primarily, Daniel and Katie both face serious material poverty due to their circumstances. These challenges are compounded by the chronic bureaucracy of the welfare system.

Katie’s failed relationships with her two children’s fathers are intrinsic to the challenges she faces. And her homelessness has meant being relocated 300 miles from her wider family. Relational poverty deepens and compounds her vulnerability.

And both forms of poverty are continually undermining both Daniel and Katie’s dignity, self-worth and sense of identity.  Daniel comes out fighting, vowing right to the last never to give in. Katie confesses that she is ‘going under’ and feels she has no option but to turn to activities which further undermine her self-esteem.

Faith fighting poverty

We live in a time when welfare reform and the numbers using food banks is front page news. The compassion showed by many churches and community groups in setting up food banks is building up into a concern for justice.  This is right. We should not just be pulling people out of the river; we should also go upstream and prevent them from being pushed in in the first place.

I firmly believe that the Church has resources to combat all three of these forms of poverty:

  • To fight material poverty through practical help such as food banks and by advocating for social justice.
  • To fight relational poverty by being a diverse, welcoming community supporting families and especially those who are vulnerable and lonely.
  • And most deeply, to fight a poverty of identity by sharing a gospel message of God’s love, forgiveness and affirmation which is available to everybody.

Your response?

I would recommend that every church should organise a trip to go and see the film and then discuss how they can respond to the Daniel Blakes and Katies who live in our communities.  Why not organise this in your church and announce it this Sunday?

One action to start the ball rolling could be to sign up to Church Action on Poverty‘s End Hunger in the UK campaign. This would be a fitting response to this powerful film.

Posted in Films & music, Poverty | Tagged , | 3 Comments

As a Christian, this is why I am voting for Trump – by Nick Miles

trumpAlthough I’m an American Citizen, I was raised in the UK and have also lived in Europe and Asia. I do understand why many Brits and others struggle to understand Trump’s popularity.

I want to explain why people like me will be voting for him on November 8th.


As a Christian and an American Citizen, a number of issues are of great importance to me during this 2016 election cycle.  But my primary concern for 2016 is the preservation of the US Constitution and defending our God-given rights to Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Speech. While both have been under attack for decades, the attacks have accelerated and deepened under the Obama regime.

America is therefore at a crossroads and faces an irrevocable decision between an America based upon the supreme law of the land – the US Constitution – or a shadow of this ideal.

Flawed candidates 

While Clinton and Trump are both flawed candidates it’s important to note that neither has been charged with the crimes that they are accused of. Of the two candidates however, only Clinton faces allegations of demonstrating criminal intent at the highest levels of federal government office.

In light of these flaws, reasonable people will switch their consideration to which party will establish the best Executive Branch of Government. For me, this has to be for the Republican Party – and consequently for Trump as President.

First Freedoms

Our ‘First Freedom’ under the US Constitution is the right to Religious Freedom and from this all other rights flow; such as Freedom of Speech. These first freedoms defend us from autocratic tyranny; whether perpetrated on the left or right.

The Bible was the book that the Framers and Founders quoted most when forming both the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. Their clear intention was for America to be “One Nation under God” – that all people are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights – as such government can’t take away these rights.

Without our first two freedoms, American democracy can’t function properly and our country will spiral further into decline.

Freedoms trampled

Unfortunately, the Democrats have a long track record of trampling on these freedoms e.g. the 1954 Johnson Amendment unconstitutionally silenced pastors in the pulpit from endorsing political candidates and the Supreme Court has misused the 14th Amendment by legalized both abortion (1973) and Same-sex  Marriage (2015).

The consequences (sometimes unintended) of these unconstitutional decisions are a silent and disengaged church – because a silent pulpit leads to silent pews. But also, 58.5 million humans murdered by abortion and many Christians losing their livelihoods after asserting their inalienable right to Religious Freedom. Democrats are also working to replace our First Right with a restricted right to ‘worship’. By ‘worship’ they mean a limited right to express ones faith in private i.e. they wish to exclude religion from the public sphere entirely.

Branches of power

To help preserve our God given liberties, the Framers of the Constitution equally divided Federal Government power between three branches of government: Executive, Judiciary and Legislative (Congress).

Under the constitution only Congress has authority to create law, and the established purpose of the Supreme Court – the judicial branch – is to determine the constitutionality of those laws.  The law of the land is the Constitution, not the Supreme Court.

False interpretation

Unfortunately judges appointed by Democrats have a long history of falsely interpreting the constitution in an expansive way as a “living document”, (e.g. Roe v. Wade 1973 & Obergefell v. Hodges 2015). As such they have chosen to falsely interpret the Constitution and thus usurp Congresses constitutional and legal role as lawmakers.

In contrast, Republican-appointed judges have a track record of interpreting cases against the Constitution as a “limited document”, seeking to understand the original intention of the Framers. The next President will have to appoint one or more Supreme Court Justices, which receive lifetime appointments. This decision will impact the court and the nation for decades to come.

Honouring the constitution

I understand why many people don’t like Trump. He has many flaws, but they are not as serious as those of Clinton and the Democratic Party. To protect our God given freedoms and defend our nation, I will be voting for the Republican Party because they vow to appoint Supreme Court Justices with track records of honouring the Constitution. Nothing else is more important in 2016.

Nick Miles lives in California with his wife and children and is a member of an independent evangelical church.

Posted in Politics | Tagged | 13 Comments

‘It has saved me from a whole heap of misery’: one night sleeping rough to help bring others in from the cold

olive-and-kidsOn Friday night, 40 people slept outside on cardboard in the churchyard of St James’ Church Piccadilly in central London.  I was there, along with my Mum (75), son (13), daughter (8), as well as my brother and two nieces.

It was noisy and cold, and sightings of rats scurrying nearby did not exactly help any of us sleep well.

oliveIt is a sad fact, that the numbers of rough sleepers in London has gone up every year since 2010. Westminster is the homeless epicentre of the UK.

We know that sleeping out for one night can never replicate the real experience of genuinely homeless people. But our one night of discomfort was to raise money for the work of the Westminster Churches Winter Shelter which brings together 13 churches and a synagogue who open each night to offer a meal and a bed to homeless people between October and May every year.

The shelter is coordinated by the charity I work for, the West London Mission.  What makes the scheme so effective is the blend of professional advice and expertise along with the amazing warmth and hospitality that the churches provide.

richard-michaelAt the start of the sleep out, the vicar Lucy Winkett, who also slept out, welcomed everyone to St James’. We then heard from two of the current guests, Richard and Michael (pictured) who are staying in the Shelter came and spoke about their experiences.

They also wrote out their stories so we could share them. Michael, wrote the following:

‘I once lived in a nice place, but many of my problems have been caused by an addiction to gambling. I began ignoring the bills when they were small and manageable. But as every person knows, small bills become big bills.  Also, my benefits were stopped after I walked out of a government computer course as I have always had a real aversion to technology.

My way of dealing with it was to bury my head in the sand and I chose to ignore all the letters that came through the door. Then one day, the inevitable happened when I came home and my place had all the locks changed. Looking back, I must have had a nervous breakdown.

I began sleeping rough out on the streets. This is where the West London Day Centre came to my rescue and helped me with my benefit. They also referred me to a GP and was given medication to help with my depression.  Karen at the Day Centre helped me deal with things – even though I would still encounter difficulties, I now had someone to help me.

I am now residing in 7 different churches who open up to give us a lovely meal and a bed. Its wonderful to be able to go somewhere so warm and welcoming each night.

The Day Centre and shelter has been instrumental in helping me with any difficulties that I have encountered.  Any funding they receive is truly deserved – they provide homeless people with food, clothes, showers, benefit advice, medical help and opticians. They without a shadow of a doubt have saved me from a whole heap of misery.”

So, whilst it was only one night of discomfort for me and my family it helped all of us reflect more on what its like to be homeless. It also helped raise over £20,000 which all goes directly into helping people like Michael.

Last year, WLDC helped 366 people to come off the streets and into accommodation. We have a dedicated team who work incredibly hard. Please consider supporting our work – you can donate easily via our Just Giving Page.

Posted in Homelessness | Tagged | 3 Comments

What would the prophet Amos say to Donald Trump?

spirituality-groupOne of my favourite parts of my job is when I am asked to facilitate the spirituality discussion group at West London Mission’s Day Centre for homeless people.  We see around a hundred rough sleepers every day who come in for breakfasts, showers, medical help and appointments with our team.

The spirituality discussion group meets every Tuesday. At the start of each term, the regulars in the group plan out the different weekly topics they want to look at for the months ahead. The group had asked me to help them ‘look at an Old Testament book’ so I gave them three options: Amos, Habakkuk or Jonah. They picked Amos.


As always the group this Tuesday was a highly diverse group of people: Latvian, Polish, Jamaican, Mancunian – as well as a few Londoners. Some with Catholic backgrounds, others Baptist and Pentecostal, some agnostic, some who don’t believe in God at all.  And one who described himself as ‘Bapticostal’.

In some ways, it is very much like a regular church home group. In other ways it is completely different.

There is an honesty and openness in the group which always inspires me. Sure, the group needs managing. People disagree, interrupt each other, go off tangent. But when we grapple with the Bible and share the thoughts and feelings invoked, scripture comes to life in a fresh and powerful way.

What is a prophet?

A number of the group admitted they had not even heard of the book of Amos. So to get us started, I posed the question ‘What is a prophet?’ Initially a few thought it was someone who predicts the future. But this was challenged by others who felt a prophet was not so much a ‘fortune teller’ but someone ‘who stands up and says it like it is’.

We then watched a brief clip of Martin Luther King speaking. The group were struck by how firmly and clearly King connected his political and social action in God’s vision. As someone put it ‘He clearly believed he was speaking God’s words’.

Amos’ fiery message

We then turned to Amos. I introduced what we know of him – that he was a shepherd and fig-tree farmer and was not a priest or religious professional.  He lived at a time when Israel was very rich and prosperous but where there was widespread mistreatment of the poor. He was from a small, remote village but took his message right to centre of power.

Rather than have a polite ‘spiritual’ figure in mind, we needed to think of Amos as someone with a fiery message – who challenged the political and religious establishment. And the powerful didn’t like it.

Corruption and injustice

We focused on Chapter 5 in Amos and everyone took turns to read a few verses. Amos’ fierce criticisms of corruption and social injustice struck a chord with many in the room:

You people hate anyone who challenges injustice and speaks the whole truth in court. You have oppressed the poor and robbed them of their grain. And so you will not live in the fine stone houses you build or drink wine from the beautiful vineyards you plant.”

We discussed his criticism of a society where people keep their heads down and don’t speak up:

“You persecute good people, take bribes, and prevent the poor from getting justice in the courts. And so, keeping quiet in such evil times is the smart thing to do!”

And many comments were made about how critical Amos is of religion itself:

“I hate, I despise your religious festivals; your assemblies are a stench to me….Away with the noise of your songs! I will not listen to the music of your harps. But let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream!”

Reading the Bible with people who have so little and have been through so much can be a rich experience.  And especially when people can sense the relevance and power of these words for today.  As we ended the session, one person said:

‘I reckon Amos would have plenty to say if he was around today..especially to people like that Donald Trump!’


Posted in Homelessness | Tagged , | 10 Comments

“In reaching out to the lost, I think I have found myself”: Review of ‘The Genius of the Poor’ by Thomas Graham

genius-of-the-poor-new-cover-2“Somewhat ironically, my 12-month journey amongst the unlearned and unschooled has taught me more insights and life lessons than all my privileged education had achieved back home.”

In 2012, Londoner Thomas Graham arrived in the Philippines expecting to stay one month. His assignment was to write an investment report on the Philippines, ‘one of the fastest growing economies in Asia’.

Having interviewed various politicians and businessmen, the turning point came when Graham interviewed Tony Meloto, whose work has been credited with transforming 2,500 of the poorest communities in the Philippines.

Graham walked into the interview in his suit and tie, expecting it to last around half an hour.  But this encounter with Tony Meloto changed his life as he learnt more about the movement called Gawad Kalinga (which means ‘to give care’) that Meloto founded.


Instead of giving him the straight-forward answers that he wis looking for, Meloto challenges Graham to go out and see the transformed communities himself and to understand the ‘genius’ that is within them. It’s a challenge that Graham accepts and which leads to profound consequences:

‘A few weeks later I make the most drastic decision in my (so far) unremarkable career. Ditching the suit and tie, I decide to extend my stay in the Philippines a few extra months…the well paid job and thirty-fourth floor condo in Makati are things of the past. Instead I am living in Tony Melito’s mosquito-infested lowly basement with half a dozen young sweaty Frenchmen for company.’

He is honest about his motivations:

‘I have not made this decision because I have turned into a selfless ‘do-gooder’ overnight…My prime motivation is more selfish than that. I am envious of the commitment, compassion and courage of the young people I have met…qualities I feel are missing from my own life. They are not just complaining about the inequality in their country but doing something about it.’

Finding true purpose

Essentially, this is a conversion story of how a young man from a privileged background sees something within the poor communities of the Philippines that he wants and needs for himself.

It is not a story of ‘reaching down’ to the poor but of the deep happiness that can be found in finding true purpose and meaning in joining a movement for change. And it’s a movement which is not focused on charity and dependency but on empowerment, dignity and solidarity.

Powerful resources

The book describes how Gawad Kalinga (GK) has been effective because it has harnessed the powerful resources at the heart of Filipino society.   Despite overwhelming material poverty, the communities are rich in other resources, such as faith and family.

The Philippines is one of the most religious countries in the world, and GK emerged from the Catholic organisation Couples for Christ.  Like so many social action organisations, it was faith in God which was the original catalyst. And faith remains a powerful resource for solidarity, hope and change even though GK now works far beyond its Catholic roots.

The challenge for the UK

As I read more and more about the power of these resources to create change, I felt challenged about what this means for the UK.  Belief in God and a commitment to family life are probably weaker than ever in our individualistic society.  And many of our economically poor communities are further disadvantaged by a deep poverty of relationships and of identity.

Despite our relative wealth, we are often poor in other ways. How will the UK build the kind of social capital in its poor communities that has been possible in the Philippines?

The start of another journey…

The story ends with the start of another. Back in the UK, talking with mates in the pub, Graham was frustrated with how difficult it was to convey what he has seen and experienced. So he repeats the challenge that Tony Meloto gave him and urges his friends to come out to see the communities for themselves. This leads him to hit upon the idea of setting up a travel agency to facilitate ‘social tourism’, with the aim to “connect the bewildered rich with the enterprising poor so that both will benefit.”

It’s a fitting end to a moving story. In ditching the suit, tie and professional detachment, Tom Graham discovered a way of changing the world which inspired him. But in doing so, he discovered meaning and purpose for himself.

Buy ‘The Genius of the Poor’ by Thomas Graham

Thomas Graham is based in the Philippines, running a social enterprise he founded called MAD (Make a Difference) Travel which facilitates social tourism in conjunction with GK’s communities. For more information see or email Tom at

Posted in Poverty, Recommended books | Tagged | 6 Comments

‘The longest suicide vote in history’: Why I have left the Labour Party

BRITAIN-EU-BREXIT-POLITICSIn 1983 Michael Foot was leader of the Labour Party at the General Election when the Conservatives, under Margaret Thatcher, won a landslide victory.

The recent victory in the Falklands War undoubtedly helped, but despite the harsh economic policies, massive unemployment and civil unrest of the early 80s, Labour’s opposition simply could not compete with the Conservatives.

Labour were seen by most as too left wing and led by a leader who no one could see as a potential Prime Minister. The Labour election manifesto was later described by Gerald Kaufman, a Labour MP, as ‘the longest suicide note in history.’

Today, Labour is in an even more disastrous situation. Yesterday, Jeremy Corbyn was elected as leader with a larger mandate than this time last year. The grassroots activists and members of Labour clearly want him leading the party.  They hold out a hope, like the Labour Party of the early 80s, that the rightful place for the party is the radical left.

Electoral oblivion

But they are deluded. Labour, despite the half million people who voted, are heading for electoral oblivion at the next election.  They have become the party of protest – of demos, rallies and shouting in the streets.  The myriad of left-wing causes who cluster together in loose alliance at marches and festivals will be delighted by Corbyn’s victory. But in terms of electoral politics, this socialist utopia will not come to anything, except wallowing in terminal debates about its own purity.

The Labour Party does not exist to be a protest movement on the margins of society. It exists to exercise power. To gain election victories to bring about changes in how the country is run.  When it becomes unelectable it is completely failing to do its job.

Impact on real people

I joined the Labour Party in 1993 when I was a student.  At the time I was volunteering in a drop-in centre for homeless people in Hull. It was in places like this that I learnt my politics – seeing the carnage caused by the economic policies of the Tory government and the impact it had on real people. But I had little time for the Marxists and Socialist Workers who shouted loudly on campus within the unrealistic bubble of student politics.

It was from this time that Labour became credible and went on to win three General Elections.   Their blend of social justice and sound economic management resonated with the country.  Of course, there were problems, most notably, the disastrous decision to invade Iraq. But domestically, the Labour years saw huge investment in local communities which made the country a better and more just place.

Reducing homelessness

Take my area of work, homelessness, as an example. Upon election, Labour established a Social Exclusion Unit with the specific target of reducing street homelessness in London by two-thirds. Through significantly increased funding, strong leadership and coordination, this target was achieved.  Numbers of rough sleepers fell to the lowest point in decades. I was on the front line at the time, managing a hostel for young homeless people in Soho. I saw first-hand how good politics changes people’s lives. These were the fruits of a Labour government.

But now, rough sleeping has shot up by over 50% in the last 5 years. Tory politics is again leading to massive increases in homelessness and poverty.  And yet there is no credible opposition to the Tories’ austerity and cuts.  They can do what they want for the foreseeable future.

Labour’s impasse

In the leadership election between Jeremy Corbyn and Owen Smith, I did not even vote as I don’t believe in either of them as leaders of the party.  I therefore don’t feel I can remain a member of a party which cannot even put up a candidate I can believe in.

Corbyn may be a decent person but his refusal to lead the party from anywhere near it’s centre means that Labour will continue to be stuck in an impasse between the elected MPs and the membership.  Only the Tories will benefit from this. He will have to crash and burn at a General Election before Labour can move on.  But in the meantime, I can’t support or promote him as a possible Prime Minister.  So for me, the Party is over.


This does not mean I am any less committed to social justice. I will remain a member of Christians on the Left and continue to work every day, practically and politically, for a better future for people who are homeless and marginalised.

And I hope that one day I can join, or possibly re-join, a party who can credibly fight for this too.

  • Sign up to receive an email for every new R&R post – see right hand tab 
  • Like the R&R facebook page
Posted in Politics | 22 Comments

We need Sport Relief from corporate injustice – by Andy Turner

Sport reliefSo another Sport Relief has come and gone. An unrelenting mash up of fun, sporting heroics, comedy and conviction, highlighting poverty and raising money.

The banter, unlikely competitions, silly stunts, and comedy sketches are fun. The heroic feats, especially Eddie Izzard’s incredible 27 marathons in 27 days, are inspiring.

The short, beautifully crafted films capture eye-watering poverty with grim commentary that pulls no punches.

On the night, if the extreme silliness and comedy jars with the hard-hitting stories, then on the whole Sport Relief seem to pull it off. The whole venture feels like a great endeavour with a powerful purpose.

Part of the problem

For me the big problem is the absence of any comment on corporate and government policy, affecting the lives of those featured.  There is plenty of charity, but what about justice?

We hear plenty about the big corporates who are sponsoring the events – but we don’t get to hear about changes in their investment policies. Or the impact of mainstreaming their Fairtrade range. Or paying workers a Living Wage.

So the Premier League raised over a £1 million. The accountants, Deloitte report that in 2013-14 the combined revenues of Premier League clubs soared by 29% to over £3.26 billion.  A million seems a bit piffling.

I’d like to hear Sport Relief highlight this absurd inequality. I’d love to hear the Premier League report all its clubs are paying a Living Wage.

Challenging the system

The comedian John Bishop talks about his visit to a rubbish dump in Kenya and the people he met who live around it.  We cheer when we hear that Margaret is now away from the tip and going to school. And her Grandma has started a business. We don’t hear that the rubbish dump is still there, and remains a magnet to the poorest and most vulnerable. The system remains.

It’s ironic to hear pronouncements about UK government matching donations to Sport Relief via Gift Aid, when so many of the projects that will benefit are facing crippling cuts or closure because of government policies introduced targeting cuts to small voluntary organisations. Or that users of the services are victims to cuts targeting the most vulnerable. Or victims of welfare reform. We don’t hear about this. It’s a huge absence.

‘What we need to change’

“We need to show you what you, what we, need to change” says Danny Dyer. The problem is no amount of donations will bring the change he’s calling for. We need system change – and that comes through progressive policies, the ballot box and an ethical, regulated market. It won’t happen after a mini-Luther, and a quick text on a Friday night.

I’m up for Sport Relief, Comic Relief. Here’s to more comedy and creativity and acts of individual generosity – and extraordinary projects that inspire.

But alongside this, we need to hear real stories about unregulated markets – about landlords raising rents and making life intolerable for the poorest. Or the impact of a social ‘safety net’ quietly dismantled and a spike in the numbers of homeless. The human cost of closures, cuts, of policies pursuing profits and privatisation.

And alongside stories of individuals who have had their lives transformed, lets include a Danny Boyle style celebration of systems we need: decent public health, public housing and public education. Systems that benefit large numbers of the poorest and most vulnerable. The systems that bring the kind of justice our world longs for.

Andy Turner lives in Hackney, East London. He has been involved in establishing a wide range of community development initiatives that tackle disadvantage and poverty.

Posted in Politics, Poverty | Tagged | 2 Comments

Losing their religion: why Christian charities lose their ethos

warning strong currentIt cannot be disputed that Churches are very good at establishing social action projects.

In recent years this is illustrated by the high-profile rise of church-based Food Banks, Night Shelters, debt services and a whole range of street outreach.  Organisations like The Trussell Trust, Street Pastors and Christians Against Poverty have seen their work grow at an incredible rate.

But this is not just a recent phenomena.  Each of my last three employers all represent different aspects of the long tradition of Christian social activism.

In the late 1990s, I worked for five years for the youth homeless charity Centrepoint which was started by the late Rev Kenneth Leech. He was an Anglican priest who opened up his church, St Anne’s Soho, as a night shelter in 1969.

In 2002, I went to work for the Shaftesbury Society (now Livability), a large charity who ran a wide range of disability services and urban community work.  They started life as The Ragged School Union, a movement of Christian activists providing education to poor children who were championed by the anti-child labour activist, MP Lord Shaftesbury.

And for the last six years, I have led the social work of the West London Mission which is part of the Methodist Church.  Since it started in 1887, it has been combating poverty and destitution. Today we employ 70 people in a wide range of services for people affected by homelessness, addiction and personal difficulties.

The biggest challenge

But despite the on-going rise of Christian social activism, my experience tells me that the biggest challenge is how Christian organisations and projects (large or small) maintain their ethos.  I know of so many organisations, both large and small, which were birthed with a strong Christian basis, but have now left it behind.

Sometimes faith becomes faded due to a lack of passion or commitment or departure of a key person: “We used to be more overt about faith but it doesn’t really happen anymore.”

Sometimes it is lost due to fear:  “It would not go down too well with our funders if we were too Christian.”

And sometimes faith just become fossilised. “The vicar still chairs the committee but there is no real connection with the church.”

Rather than something dynamic and creative at its heart of the organisation, often faith becomes little more than a slightly embarrassing footnote in its history.

Why does this happen?

There are many reasons why this ‘dis-integration’ of faith happens.

A hostile context.  In our post-Christendom age, when Christianity is no longer the dominant voice, it has been fashionable for the Christian faith to be associated with oppressive behaviour.  Even though this has decreased in recent years, some funders, councils and regulatory bodies can be inherently suspicious about churches.

Practical challenges.  As charities grow, expand and take on more staff they need to take seriously employment law, equal opportunities and a wide range of regulation. It can be harder for the faith to survive alongside such practical demands.  And there can be problems when a visionary founder moves on and a ‘second generation’ of leadership takes over.

Theological weaknesses.  Many activists do not think much about theology at all – ‘doing stuff’ always takes priority.  Also, some will not think that maintaining a Christian ethos really matters.  And often, even the most vocal and vibrant expressions of Christianity struggle to integrate themselves alongside practical work. There can be a shortage of ‘bridging’ skills to connect theology to practical work.

For all these reasons, running a Christian social action project means swimming in a strong current. This will often take us in a secular direction – unless we are committed to swimming against it.

Rather than being faded, fearful and fossilised, how can faith be expressed in ways that are clear, confident and creative?

The West London Mission and the theological think tank, Theos, are running a free training event on this very issue:

‘Doing God’ in Social and Community Work: Confidence, Creativity and Christian ethos

This interactive and practical training day will focus on how to hold onto a Christian ethos in the delivery of their social and community work.  It will be facilitated by Jon Kuhrt, Executive Director, and Ruth Bottoms, Chaplain at the West London Mission. There will also be input from Paul Bickley, the author of the recent Theos Report, The Problem of Proselytism.

‘Doing God’ is for anyone who works and volunteers for, or alongside, a faith-based organisation. It will also be helpful for commissioners within government or those in other funding or regulatory bodies.

Thursday, 14 April 2016 from 9:30am to 4.00pm

Hinde Street Methodist Church, 19 Thayer Street, London W1U 2QJ

To book a place go to our Eventbrite page

Please share this with anyone you know who might be interested!

Posted in Social action | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Love without structures: learning from the collapse of Kid’s Company

Camilla's Kid's CompanyThis week the BBC screened a fascinating documentary, Camila’s Kid’s Company: the Inside Story, on the demise of the famous children’s charity.

What made the programme so compelling was its intimate portrayal of the Chief Executive, Camila Batmanghelidjh.  We see her close-up, as she lived through the collapse of the charity she had founded, in the full glare of the media.

The importance of love

A few years ago I met Camila when we were both on a panel discussing poverty at the National Prayer Breakfast at Parliament.  What most struck me then was her willingness to talk about the importance of love. She spoke in a completely different way to any other ‘charity CEO’ I had heard.

I used to be the Manager of an emergency hostel for homeless young people in Soho, central London. I worked with the most damaged and chaotic homeless young people imaginable, but she challenged me to think differently about the core needs of the young people I worked with.  As she repeats in this documentary:

“Love is not a word that ‘professionals’ are comfortable with”

The documentary captures the way Camila managed to establish a project based on her core convictions: to show the love and acceptance of a family.


But as we know now, Kid’s Company is no more.  It closed last summer in a blaze of negative publicity and scandal about financial mismanagement and accusations of dubious practices. Further reports have come out since with strong criticisms of the failure of the Trustees to hold their charismatic CEO to account.

The Kid’s Company story is a parable about the need for organisational structures and good management.  In order to remain safe and sustainable, the good intentions to show love and acceptance need to be framed within structures which provide boundaries and accountability.

‘Mr Double-glazing’

There is a particularly telling part of the programme where Camila goes in to see a new Chief Operating Officer who has been brought in by the trustees to bring some order to the organisation. She stands outside his door telling the camera that she calls him ‘Mr Double-glazing’. This is because he acts like a salesman but also is emotionally detached from the work they do, so its like talking to someone behind a window.

The tragedy is that Camila could not recognise the vital contribution that a good operations manager could have brought. However inspirational or gifted they are, the wisest leaders surround themselves with people with skills they don’t have.

Good process

More than anything Kid’s Company probably needed one or two key people who were able to detach themselves from the emotions involved in the work and ensure some good process.  In an age obsessed with inspirational leaders, we easily forget the basic importance of good management.

The sustaining of charitable work involves good planning, clear communication and strong financial systems.  Good process and proper governance are not ends in themselves but are ‘just structures’ which should serve and sustain the front line work.

These kind of organisational structures play the same role that our bones do in our bodies. They give shape and structure to the whole body and protect the vital organs.  The heart and lungs are dependent on the protection that the rib cage gives.  Like bones, organisational structures provide a framework around which everything can function safely.


Everyone involved in charities, churches and youth work can learn lessons from what happened to Kid’s Company. Churches are particularly vulnerable to similar problems because of the value they put on the charismatic power of their leader and the cultural tendency to avoid asking hard questions.

But it seems clear that within Kid’s Company the emotional demands of the work continually over rid the necessity of any meaningful self-critique. The fault always lay outside – with the media or the government.

Rather than pay any attention to the structural weaknesses of her organisation, Camila believed that the hemorrhaging of funds could simply be filled by more and more fundraising. But however skilled she was at persuading the likes of Coldplay, JK Rowling and David Cameron to donate funds, it was not enough to save the great work they did.

Watch BBC’s Camila’s Kid’s Company: the Inside Story

  • Sign up to receive an email for every new R&R post – see right hand tab 
  • Like the R&R facebook page
Posted in Social action | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Being a voice for the voiceless in politics – by Alison Hill

PlatoThe last few months have seen some huge political decisions being made: whether to extend airstrikes against ISIS, the response to the refugee crisis, the UK’s commitments in the UN Climate Change Talks, or the reaction to the flooding seen over the Christmas period.

These are political decisions which impact the lives of millions of people, both here in the UK and around the world. Is this enough of a reason for Christians to get involved in politics?

Exercising power

Christians shouldn’t be seeking power for the sake of power. But we should think from another angle: who our politicians are exercising this power for? 

From this perspective, we should see politics as an opportunity for making a difference.

Many today, Christians included, are obsessed with standing up for their own rights and for the rights of people like them. The idea of standing up for someone else challenges the self-interest that so many associate with politics.

Speaking up for the voiceless

In Proverbs 31:8, it says:

“Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute.”

Many are left voiceless in our society: those who are poor, weak and vulnerable. Those who have been let down by the system.

And we have to remember that the UK’s actions have a profound impact on those in other parts of the world. Whenever our government makes decisions about international aid, whether or not to intervene in corrupt regimes, as well as on environmental issues, it is directly impacting the voiceless around the world.

The Church has done much to help the victims of injustice, both locally and globally, through initiatives such as foodbanks and night-shelters, as well as through relief and development work. These are practical expressions of the command to love our neighbours as ourselves.

Preventing the problems

However, it is not enough simply to try and patch up the problems in our society. We must also help to prevent these problems developing in the first place. Desmond Tutu once said:

“As Christians, we need to not just be pulling the drowning bodies out of the river. We need to be going upstream to find out who is pushing them in.”

This is often harder and more laborious. We will forsake the feel-good factor of seeing transformation first-hand, but it is vital work. We are able to have much more of an impact on preventing problems in our society from occurring if we are involved in the political process.  We can be involved and go beyond just shouting from the sidelines.

Biblical examples 

There is so much political figures in the Bible – people such as Joseph, Daniel, Esther and Obadiah who brought about change from the inside. Joseph’s political role allowed him to save the Egyptian people, and his own family, from famine.  Esther used her influence with Xerxes to save the Jewish people from genocide.

Following their example, Christians have been inspired to be a voice for the voiceless in the realm of politics. William Wilberforce was motivated by his Christian faith to work tirelessly for the abolition of the slave trade.

Getting involved

There are many ways in which we can join in. We can pray for those in power to govern wisely, we can write to our MP about issues which concern us, and we ourselves can get involved in the political system, by joining a party and seeking to work for change from within. The Christians in Politics website is a good place to start.

Politics is not the ultimate panacea to injustice in our society, and there is an important role for those on the outside of mainstream politics to campaign for change.  But being involved in the system is still one of the more strategic ways of making a difference in the lives of the voiceless in our society.

It is through politics that laws can be changed, policy can be reworked, voices can be heard. Let us speak out for the voiceless from within the political system and help make a difference in a world so scarred by injustice.

Alison Hill has just completed an internship with Christians in Politics. This article was first published in the Church of England Newspaper

Posted in Politics | Tagged | 5 Comments