‘Dossers’ who choose to sleep rough and the ‘professional weepers’ who care: ‘The Sun’ on homelessness in 1990

the-sun-logo_0I was clearing out some old paperwork this week at the West London Mission and I found some fascinating old newspaper clippings relating to homelessness.

sun-editorial-march-1990One clipping particularly struck me. It was from The Sun, March 1990. It starts:

IT’s time we stopped feeling guilty about the plight of dossers sleeping rough on our streets. 

Professional weepers claim there are 73,000 homeless in London alone.

Their cries of “shame” are loud enough to reach Buckingham Palace and suck Prince Edward into the cause.

It goes on:

The truth is, most dossers are on the streets through CHOICE.

Some are obviously not capable of looking after themselves. Those need all the care that our hospitals can provide.

But spare us this barrage of emotional blackmail from groups driven by POLITICAL motives.

There are far bigger causes to champion in this world.

Dramatic rise 

It is interesting that 1990 was a time when the numbers of homeless people on the streets had dramatically risen and it was becoming an increasingly high profile issue.

I remember it well because I left school in 1990 and got a cleaning job which meant being on The Strand in central London by 7.00am every morning. The extent of the rough sleeping at that time was truly shocking – with 3-4 people sleeping under almost every doorway.  Villiers Street, which runs down from The Strand to the Embankment, was like a homeless village with countless people huddled together under cardboard.  It had a massive impact on me.

Political pressure

Although The Sun peddled such harsh and judgmental views, the political pressure created by homelessness was too much for Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government to ignore. The sight of so many rough sleepers, many of them very young, around Whitehall and Westminster did produce policy change.

The Rough Sleeper’s Initiative was launched later in 1990 and allocated £350m over three years to reduce homelessness.  It was the subject of my dissertation at University and in 1993 I started work in a direct-access hostel for homeless young people that it helped fund.

Warning from history

In one way, this editorial is an illustration of how things have improved.  Only this week, The Evening Standard (another paper which used to regularly called homeless people ‘dossers’) launched a front page campaign to support one of my former employers, Centrepoint. There is definitely improved understanding and more humane responses to homeless people.

But this editorial is also a warning from history.  It shows how recently people with chronic needs, affected by trauma and poverty were dismissed contemptuously by the UK’s most popular newspaper.

Over the years, I have heard countless stories from homeless people about being threatened, kicked and urinated on.  And it is spiteful views like the ones in this article which provide fuel, and some warped justification, for these kinds of inhumane behaviours.

Toxic journalism

Reading it today makes me feel proud of my predecessors in this work, dismissed as ‘professional weepers’, who DID stand up for the vulnerable and made their voice heard at a time when this issue was far less fashionable.

Today it is other vulnerable groups, such as refugees, who are often the target of tabloid contempt. We should never underestimate the toxic nature of ignorant forms of journalism which make sweeping statements about whole groups of vulnerable people and mock those who show concern.

About Jon Kuhrt

Jon Kuhrt works with people affected by homelessness, offending and addictions at the West London Mission. He, his wife and three children are part of Streatham Baptist Church and he is a member of the Christians on the Left. He likes football...but loves cricket.
This entry was posted in Homelessness. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to ‘Dossers’ who choose to sleep rough and the ‘professional weepers’ who care: ‘The Sun’ on homelessness in 1990

  1. John Bavington says:

    Jon,
    Thanks so much for this post, and for your work. I was at a New Wine Urban Forum this week and was again struck by the challenges we face in dealing with the causes of poverty.
    I really came on here to comment that I hope you haven’t thrown those cuttings away – they are a really valuable piece of social history. Many blessings.
    John

    • Jon Kuhrt says:

      Thanks John – no I am a big believer in good archiving. The thing is that you have to be ruthless about throwing away the rubbish and endless paperwork so that you can see the gems! It is all safely stored in some nice plastic boxes!

  2. Agent X says:

    Thanx for the post. Yes, the blast from the past and lining up with the hindsight we now have of what was still future then, is meaningful. I am especially grateful that you, and your predecessors, stood firm and cared for people amid public contempt! That is huge!

    Being from USA, “Dossers” is a term I don’t know. Maybe I just live under a rock, but I sense it is a cultural thing that I do not share. Got a quick education on it for me???

    So blessed by your work, even across the drink…

    X

  3. Paul Anderson says:

    What a great find Jon. If you read Hugo Young’s unedited papers there is a line in there where he is having lunch with Chris Patten. CP is explaining that he and George Young want to do something about homelessness (which became the Rough Sleepers Initiative). Mrs Thatcher, by contrast, doesn’t see why we can’t just (& the exact phrase is something like this) “use the hose on them” .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s